You are not connected. Please login or register

Devil's Third

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Devil's Third on Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:15 am

For reference:




I haven't played it but I looked at it for a while now have some thoughts here:

Level design seems to be an issue in the campaign,  as it's way too linear and doesn't effectively allow for use of the movement options and interplay between guns, movement and melee which is something the multiplayer alleviates due to open map design. It seems too binary and encounters are either cover shooting or melee, if the levels where more open and allowed for multiple approaches via smart use of elevation navigation to flank foes then you could make melee/guns as viable as you want. It has so much more going on that basic cover shooting and melee, the interplay is what it was founded on and what the multiplayer achieves.

Bosses I'm not sure if they are bullshit poorly designed or actually good and the player just sucks, maybe mix of both. I've seen they seem unclear with their tells and openings and may get armor/iframes and have some really fast atacks and can cancel out of moves, I'm not sure in these things just notes. I do like grundla saha and kumano bosses the most(designs, themes and move sets), don't know if the angry black dood is a cheap boss but kumano seems the most fair straight away his moves make the most sense to me.

Enemy types seem lacking. Mostly soldiers with guns and/or knives, ninja, invisible ladies and big black bullet sponges that seem pretty redundant. Zombies are boring damage sponges too.

Lack of offline multiplayer functions like a wave mode against ai that would reuse multiplayer maps for offline use, that way one could really use the map to elevate the core gameplay.

It's clearly a rushed game but I'm glad it's out, it needs to find a balance between its mechanics as the story mode seems all to eager to be the next cod/army of two.

View user profile

2 Re: Devil's Third on Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:52 pm

The bosses are just really agressive, but you can nail them down hard. They are Itagaki style bosses but without him holding back. The mission 3 boss Saha is especially hard though.

The game itself really lacks a desire to use its mechanics. The gameplay itself really leans for a Vanquish style mixture of close combat and shooting, yet the enemies are all built around shooting. Going in with a katana is begging for death. Also Score-mode is no longer available, you can play it but it doesn't work as the leaderboards were taken offline sadly. Still the game holds a special place in my heart. It was the game that prompted me to start Stinger Magazine as a whole because I felt the game didn't get enough love.

View user profile http://forum.stingermagazine.com

3 Re: Devil's Third on Sat Oct 28, 2017 7:54 am

So no commentary for the lp? I always enjoy your commentary Roy.

View user profile

4 Re: Devil's Third on Sat Oct 28, 2017 8:20 am

Birdman


Moderator
I totally get what you're saying about going in with the katana. I kept trying to slide and get up close but got destroyed once the enemies had guns.

Are there any abilities later that give you more options for scenarios like this?

View user profile

5 Re: Devil's Third on Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:08 am

Yeah I got a bit tired of recording commentary at that time and just wanted to get the run out haha. I just want to share the content, but I don't always feel like sitting down and talking to a screen for an hour ;p

That....and my recording of chpt2 got corrupted. At which point I thought fuck it. Sorry man! But glad to hear you like them : ) What do you like more? Live commentary or just post-commentary?

@birdman, there are no new abilities except Devil Trigger which unlocks in chapter 2 I believe. It's nothing too special, just ups damage and increases your defense a bit. Melee should only be used when needed in this game, it isn't the focus.

View user profile http://forum.stingermagazine.com

6 Re: Devil's Third on Sun Oct 29, 2017 7:53 am

I like both types of commentary, the post commentary adds a different perspective, seems best for analytical talk, since one can focus on just commentating while they break down the footage, more distant I guess. The live commentary may offer more moment to moment relevance and humour, more spontaneous and stream of consciousness I think is what I mean. Sorry I'm not very good at typing my thoughts.

View user profile

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum